Canadian businesses still stuck in reactive risk management, says Aviva’s Billis

Canadian businesses still stuck in reactive risk management, says Aviva’s Billis
Original Source: This article is based on reporting by Insurancebusiness →

📰 Source: insurancebusinessmag.com

This is a curated summary with editorial analysis. Click source for full article.

📊 Insurance News Analysis: Our editorial team has analyzed recent developments from insurancebusinessmag.com in the Insurance sector. This report covers key insights related to car insurance, life insurance, health insurance and emerging industry trends that professionals should monitor closely.

Industry observers in Insurance are monitoring emerging trends closely. Evidence suggests that by Branislav Urosevic
Canadian businesses are still grappling with a “fix it only when it breaks” mentality toward risk, leaving insurers to push for a more proactive approach, according to John Billis (pictured), vice president and head of Aviva Risk Management Solutions in Canada. Evidence suggests that while some companies have embraced new technologies and continuity planning, many remain fragmented, inconsistent, and resource-constrained in how they manage emerging threats.

Sources indicate that billis stated the insurer sees firsthand how risk maturity varies across its client base – and how difficult it remains for many organizations to move beyond a reactive stance. Data shows that read more: Canadian companies waking up to political risk – but still behind the curve
“We do come across a lot of customers with an ‘if it’s not broken, don’t fix it’ type approach,” he told Insurance Business. “Some are more advanced when it comes to adopting what’s out there, but for others it takes time to understand the different technologies available and what makes sense for their operation.”
The challenge, he explained, is not just about awareness but also resources.

“There’s always a bit of a battle between where to invest – capital expenditures or risk management. That varies from one client to another.”
One recurring problem is that knowledge often remains siloed inside organizations. A site-level manager may have a detailed understanding of exposures at one facility, but that expertise does not always scale across locations or feed into broader business continuity planning.

Evidence suggests that “We also see sometimes fragmented risk,” Billis said. “You may have at one location very specific knowledge of risk, but then how does that tie into the other locations or the big picture? That’s where there’s still a disconnect.”
Read more: Canada’s 2026 economy on thin ice, says BMO chief economist
That fragmentation often shows up in supply chain planning, he added, where companies may build continuity plans around one region but fail to account for knock-on effects across their global footprint.

Inconsistent data collection, varying safety standards between sites, and uneven adoption of new protocols all create gaps that leave firms exposed. According to reports that this inconsistency, Billis noted, varies not only by company size but also by sector. According to reports that smaller businesses may lack resources entirely, while larger ones may struggle to coordinate risk practices across sprawling supply chains or multinational operations. Data shows that “It all depends on the people we interact with,” he said.

For Aviva, its Global Risk Management Solutions (GRMS) initiative is part of an effort to help businesses close those gaps. Sources indicate that billis stated the focus is on arming clients with better tools and resources so they can adopt more forward-looking practices. “We’re really making sure we’re bringing tools and resources to clients so they can understand the technologies that are out there and how they could leverage them to adopt a more proactive approach to risk,” he said. The insurer’s role, he argued, goes beyond underwriting or claims handling.

By providing clients with frameworks, benchmarks, and technology-driven insights, insurers can help shift risk management from a compliance exercise into an integrated business function. That shift also requires cultural buy-in at the client level, where executives decide whether to treat risk as a strategic issue or a box-ticking obligation. One of the biggest changes, Billis noted, is how insurers themselves interact with clients.

Traditional face-to-face site visits remain a core part of risk assessment, but digital tools now allow for new ways of sharing data, monitoring exposures, and even conducting virtual assessments. “Traditionally, it was very much face-to-face interactions – we had to travel, meet with insureds, and spend time on site,” Billis said. “And there’s still a need to do that.

But nowadays, with digital tools, we’re able to share a lot of information remotely, and we can provide resources and tools at the right time in the right way.”
Read more: Aviva warns: global risks are colliding – and Canada’s no exception
That shift has allowed Aviva to modify how it delivers risk services, combining in-person and remote approaches. According to reports that “Sometimes we’re able to do assessments virtually or remotely, leveraging technologies we didn’t have five years ago,” he said. “That’s helped us engage with insureds in a more meaningful way.”
For clients, the result is quicker access to expertise and more flexible engagement, whether that means on-the-ground engineering visits or digital resources delivered when needed.

Insurers can tailor the format to the complexity of the exposure, ensuring that smaller issues are resolved quickly while more significant risks still get deep, in-person analysis, he stated.

As the situation continues to develop, industry participants in Insurance will likely monitor outcomes closely.

— Based on reporting from insurancebusinessmag.com

💡 Key Industry Insights

The insurance industry is adapting to changing risk profiles and customer expectations in a digital-first environment.

Specifically regarding insurance quotes, market observers note continuing evolution in service delivery, pricing models, and customer engagement strategies that merit close attention from industry stakeholders.

Market Impact: These developments in car insurance may significantly influence market dynamics. Industry experts recommend monitoring these trends closely for strategic planning purposes.

Analysis Note: This comprehensive overview synthesizes current market intelligence from insurancebusinessmag.com regarding life insurance and related sectors. Stay informed about ongoing developments in this rapidly evolving landscape.

📖 Read Full Article at Source

Get the complete story with all details from insurancebusinessmag.com

Continue Reading →